Logic Reasoning Flaw Generator Author: Anonymous Fork (0)

  • it takes for granted that
  • it assumes that
  • it provides no evidence for that
  • it fails to consider that
  • it overlooks the possibility that
  • it fails to adress the issue that
  • it does not allow that
  • it ignores the fact that
  • it neglects the possibility that
  • it fails to recognize that
  • it fails to take into account that
  • only two courses of action are available
  • the options it considers are mutually exclusive
  • it is not entirely B that it is entirely C
  • something doesn’t exist because we can’t prove that it does
  • something is real or correct because we can’t prove it false.
  • what is true for A must be true for B
  • something could differentiate B from A.
  • someone's / a certain group's opinion present an accurate representation for overall evaluation / the truth.
  • the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all the information regarding a situation
  • there may be a difference of opinion among experts as to what is true in the case
  • expertise in one area of medicine does not imply expertise in all areas of medicine
  • a position is true because the majority believe it to be true.
  • not every polled individual provided a truthful response.
  • the sample set is unrepresentative
  • the survey questions are improperly constructed
  • conditions not remain constant over time
  • what applies to the past applies to now.
  • the events may be reversed.
  • one thing was caused by another although the evidence given is consistent with the first thing’s having caused the second.
  • an alternate cause for the effect, or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect.
  • the same thing may causally contribute to both
  • an association between two things might be due to their common relationship to a third factor
  • the connection between A and B could just be a coincidence
  • A guarantees / is determinant of / is the defining charcteristic of / is sufficient to validate / has an direct impact on / effects B
  • a correlation is sufficient to validate a causual relationship
  • a characteristic important for an outcome will ensure that outcome
  • what it is attempting to demonstrate is true
  • motivation impacts result.
  • the effect produced by an action can provide sufficient evidence about its purpose.
  • legislation should not be supported based on the character of some supporters of the legislation
  • a concept can vary in intensity or significance
  • one set might have some members in common with each of two others even though those two other sets have no members in common with each other
  • a guaranteed means of achieving a result is the only means of achieving that result.
  • just because others don't do it, you can't do it.
  • A is not the primary consideration for B
  • there can be general agreement that something is the case without its being the case

Result